Special for followers of codigopostalrd.net
On October 15, 2025, Paxos, the blockchain partner responsible for issuing the PayPal USD (PYUSD) stablecoin, accidentally minted approximately 300 trillion PYUSD tokens on the Ethereum blockchain due to a technical error during an internal transfer process.
This massive amount, equivalent to approximately $300 trillion at $1 per token, far exceeded the global GDP (estimated at approximately $117 trillion) and was due to what sources describe as a decimal miscalculation or “fat finger” error in the minting code.
Paxos detected the error almost immediately, and the excess tokens were burned (permanently removed from circulation) within 20–30 minutes.
Paxos emphasized that this was an internal issue with no security breach, that customer funds remained secure, and that the root cause had been addressed to prevent a recurrence. The incident quickly became public due to the transparency of blockchain records, and observers spotted the anomaly on platforms like Etherscan.
PayPal did not immediately comment, but PYUSD’s normal market capitalization at the time was approximately $2.6 billion, making this mintage more than 100,000 times larger than its legitimate supply.
The actual impacts were relatively contained due to the swift resolution, but the event had repercussions across the crypto ecosystem.
PYUSD’s price briefly deviated from its $1 peg amid the confusion but quickly stabilized following the burn. DeFi protocols like Aave temporarily froze PYUSD markets as a precaution to prevent potential exploits or liquidity leaks during the uncertainty.
No major trading disruptions occurred, and cryptocurrency markets in general (e.g., Bitcoin, Ethereum) did not show significant volatility related to this event.
The minting highlighted vulnerabilities in stablecoin issuance processes, particularly the lack of automated “proof of reserves” checks prior to minting.
PYUSD is supposed to be fully backed 1:1 by US dollars, Treasury bonds, or equivalent, but the error demonstrated that minting is not intrinsically tied to actual reserves; there are simply not enough dollars globally to back $300 trillion.
This raised concerns about the integrity of major stablecoins (PYUSD ranks sixth globally), with some analysts noting that it exposes “cryptocurrencies’ biggest flaws,” such as an overreliance on human controls without failsafes.
Public opinion on platforms like X emphasized blockchain transparency as a positive, allowing for rapid detection, but also sparked debates about whether similar errors in traditional banking would ever be revealed.
Hypothetical broader impacts if not resolved: If the tokens hadn’t been burned quickly, experts speculate on catastrophic outcomes, including:
Immediate collapse of the peg to near $0 due to unbacked supply. Chaos in DeFi: Exhausted lending platforms (e.g., Aave, Curve), depleted liquidity pools, and insolvent protocols using PYUSD as collateral.
Hyperinflation in stablecoin supply, dwarfing competitors like USDT ($118 billion) and USDC ($32 billion).
Market contagion: Volatility in major cryptocurrencies, investor flight to safer assets, and potential declines in PayPal stock.
Systemic risks: Impossible repayments requiring $300 trillion in reserves (exceeding global GDP).
Overall, the incident has intensified scrutiny over the role of stablecoins in traditional finance, especially as they are increasingly adopted by banks and payment giants like PayPal.
Paxos faced immediate questions about its internal controls, especially amid its ongoing application for a full U.S. trust charter (a regulatory update for broader operational reach).
It is unclear whether this error will delay or derail that application, as regulators such as the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) have already fined Paxos for compliance issues (e.g., a $26.5 million fine in 2025 for deficiencies, plus $22 million invested in fixes).
The company has since implemented fixes, but this incident could erode short-term trust in Paxos as a “trustworthy and compliant player.” PayPal, as a partner, could suffer indirect reputational impacts, although no direct financial losses occurred.
The error has prompted calls for stricter oversight of stablecoin issuers, which could accelerate U.S. regulation of proof-of-reserves and minting safeguards.
This could lead to congressional hearings or increased scrutiny from the NYDFS/SEC, which considers stablecoins to be potential “systemic risks.” In DeFi, protocols like Aave could adopt more proactive freezing mechanisms for similar anomalies.
Since the tokens were internal and burned quickly, no harm or exploits occurred for customers. However, it caused confusion among traders, with some initially suspecting a hack.
This small error highlights both the strengths and weaknesses of cryptocurrency systems. On the positive side, the blockchain’s public and immutable record allowed for rapid detection and transparency, unlike potential hidden errors in traditional finance.
However, it exposes critical flaws: administrative errors can create enormous risks in permissioned systems, such as stablecoin minting, where there is no built-in enforcement of reserve backing during issuance. Key takeaways include the need for:
Automated safeguards, such as pre-minting reserve verification.
Strengthened regulatory compliance and error detection at regulated cryptocurrency firms.
Greater caution in DeFi integrations to manage “black swan” anomalies.
Ultimately, while the incident was resolved without permanent damage, it serves as a wake-up call for the industry to prioritize robustness, as stablecoins connect traditional and decentralized finance.
If not for Paxos’ swift action, it could have triggered one of the largest accidental hyperinflations in financial history.
