Contenido Exclusivo!!

Impacto por demarcaciones políticas entre Karim y Santiago Matías, Alofoke, según mediciones

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/TZN_8EkvYzI?feature=share

Ciclón tropical y caos en el Teleférico: Son las principales tendencias hoy 20 de abril de 2026, en la República Dominicana

Especial para los seguidores de codigopostalrd.net Santo Domingo, 21 de...

NBA Playoffs 2026: Impacto de Lakers vs Rockets se disparan en República Dominicana y brillan en La Vega, según mediciones

Especial para los seguidores de codigopostalrd.net Santo Domingo, 19 de...
Inicio Internacionales Donald Trump’s Initiative to Abolish Filibustering in the Senate

Donald Trump’s Initiative to Abolish Filibustering in the Senate

0
31

On October 30, 2025, in the midst of a 31-day government shutdown—the longest in modern history—President Donald Trump publicly urged Senate Republicans to invoke the “nuclear option” to eliminate legislative filibustering.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote: “BECAUSE THE DEMOCRATS HAVE GONE COMPLETELY CRAZY, THE CHOICE IS CLEAR: INITIATE THE ‘NUCLEAR OPTION,’ ELIMINATE FILIBUSTING, AND MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

Filibustering requires 60 votes to end debate (shutdown) on most bills, allowing the Senate’s 47 Democrats to block Republican funding measures that mandate spending cuts and border security improvements.

Removing the amendment would allow its passage with a simple majority (51 votes, or 50 plus Vice President JD Vance’s tie-breaking vote), which Republicans control 53-47.

Republicans could immediately pass an unamended funding bill or one that includes Trump’s priorities (e.g., funding for the wall, increased budgets for ICE), the restoration of SNAP benefits, national parks, IRS refunds, and payment to 2 million federal employees and military personnel, thus alleviating public inconvenience caused by service delays.

It portrays Democrats as obstructionists, improving Republican prospects in the midterm elections and highlighting the supposed “Democratic insurrection.”

Republican Response and Strategy

Outright Rejection: Leader John Thune: “No changes”: Congressional obstruction is a “core element.” Senators Murkowski (“forever damaging”), Tillis (“never”), and Curtis (“outright no”) oppose it. McConnell has historically voted “No.”

Votes Against: Internal Sources: Insufficient support; bipartisan talks aim for an agreement next week.

Tactical Farmon: Trump’s proposal seeks to pressure for breaking Democratic obstruction without resorting to drastic measures; the government shutdown will soon end through compromise, preserving Senate rules.

Won’t Happen Now: The Republican Party prioritizes long-term protection over short-term gain; the risks outweigh the benefits with such a narrow majority.

Long-term change?: If Democrats intensify pressure (for example, by blocking Trump’s nominees), the nuclear option becomes inevitable, ushering in an era of majority rule. Trump wins a major victory in the short term; history judges him as either a bold reformer or a reckless power grab.

This highlights the fragility of the Senate: Trump demands efficiency; the senators defend tradition. The result? The government shutdown ends without death by obstruction of justice, but the tension remains.